首先我們來看看這篇名為《美國迦頓制作人的警告》，我相信深度瓣友是有能力讀懂這篇通俗易懂的文章的。Norris, the eldest son of martial arts, film and television star and WND exclusive columnist Chuck Norris, told WND he hopes that it’s entertaining and that people come away with a message.Things got just a little bit eerie while the film was being made, with many “bizarre coincidences,” he said.For example, the film’s plot includes a nuclear attack, and now North Korea is threatening the U.S. The movie also touches on weapon confiscation, just as President Obama has been pressing for more gun control.Then, one of the heroes is faced with the heavy hand of government while in real life the federal government’s massive Jade Helm military exercise in the Southwest has raised personal liberty concerns.In the movie, an electromagnetic pulse attack over the U.S. wipes out the energy grid, along with all electronic devices, such as phones, credit card processing systems and computers.The American government reacts to the attack, which was staged with the help of the U.N., by declaring martial law and stripping Americans of their constitutional rights and their guns.“Our government, bought and paid for and ruled from the bench, is our bad guy,” Norris explained. “The heroes are a group of Americans who say, ‘We have a Constitution and a Bill of Rights and we will not be trampled on.'”“Amerigeddon” touches on globalist issues such as the New World Order and the National Defense Authorization Act.“We’ve just taken our story and stripped it down to real people, real issues, real things that are happening,” he said.“It is a movie, it is fictional. But it is very much a newsreel,” he said. “If you were to just open a newspaper and look at what’s going on in the world, this is our movie.”Norris said he has been making Christian films since he directed “Walker, Texas Ranger,” his father’s television hit, in the 1990s.He said he hopes “Amerigeddon” makes people think about the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Second Amendment, because there are real world implications.For example, “If we get the wrong Supreme Court judge, it’s over,” he said.“A Nation Forsaken” by Michael Maloof lays out the reality of an EMP attack, and it’s not pretty. Available at the WND Superstore.The movie project began some 18 months ago when Heavin wrote the screenplay. Norris said he first doubted the story line, but as he began to see evidence of tyranny even in America, it suddenly seemed appropriate.He said the film tries to convey that “we feel the government is overreaching its authority; Obama is ruling from the bench, our rights are being infringed on a daily basis.”It also warns that a powerful EMP could bring America to its knees, destroying power, communications, the Internet, transportation, shipping and natural gas supplies.Mike Norris, who lives in Dallas, got his inspiration to work in film on the set of his father’s movies.“Amerigeddon” is only the first in a series of planned films and TV projects through which Norris and Heavin hope to promote patriotic values. Norris told WND the next film will portray what the world would look like a year after an EMP strike. They also hope to explore what would happen if the banks declared a holiday in America as they’ve done in Greece.        文章指出電影“直白而露骨”“毫無忌諱”地討論槍支管理、核武器控制、美國暴力執政、全球主義等熱點問題，還抨擊了資本家單純追求利益罕有回報社會的丑惡，執政過度的tyranny，轉基因研究不足之下的盲目推廣，我覺得更是對自由的具體社會思考。近期我也看了一部豆瓣評分極低的電影叫做《驗收測試》，一部對于思考槍支管理的電影。可能因為在國內個人不能合法擁有槍支有關，所以難以成為大眾討論的熱點。但是從近期層出不窮的暴力事件的網絡輿論來看，似乎呼吁效仿美國的個人槍支擁有合法化的討論正在興起。個人合法擁有槍支好嗎？一味禁止個人擁有槍支好嗎？全球主義好嗎？通過什么手段達成？不怕被暴政者所利用形成新的暴政嗎？（電影里貪婪自私的資本家說“地球最多只能容納5億人，我們愿意殺死70億人，大多數人不值得活著，大量的非洲人、印度人和拆哪人過著貧窮的生活，他們不如死了的好。沒了他們，世界將更加美好，甚至先從美國開始……”）制作人給出的答案既黑暗又帶有光明，人們終將站起來反抗。有如文章指出，制片人將在下一部作品中提出對于EMP攻擊之后的想象，如果全球恐怖襲擊了，人們將何去何從。        電影有著深刻的思考，我的能力有限無法完全解讀，至少我覺得憑內容而言，這部電影不應該只有3.7這么低分。倘若只考慮他的商業利益，是的，五毛特效，故事情節發展單一枯燥（演員還是很賣力的點個贊）。或許身為市井屁民的我們來說，思考這些問題猶如杞人憂天，狗拿耗子，但作為一個人來說，想要在一個社會立足，必須要對自由有深刻的思考，才能在某個時刻明白自己該站什么隊。