Spoiler alert先上私貨，純主觀判斷。1. 如果按照程序正義的標準，即當年OJ的標準，此案陪審團必須判無罪。怎奈陪審團腦殘。2. SA究竟是謀殺者？我不知道。但是Brendan Dassey應是無罪。again，純主觀。3. DA Kratz is such a jerk. 感謝造物主讓他因為sexting下臺。4. 希望lenk和colburn能夠hang in there，千萬不藥因為心臟病或者車禍什么的掛掉。因為等待他們的也許還有上庭入獄大禮包，還有無盡的public shaming。 目前SA所有上訴機會都已經耗盡，拒絕上訴的依舊是審判時發法官，此人由Manitowoc本地人選舉。白宮上訴無效，總統只有權力特赦聯邦犯人，SA是威斯康辛州犯人，唯獨州長可以特赦。州長已經發表聲明拒絕特赦。SA在本案中的辯護律師和本紀錄片的制片人的共識：需要新的證據才可以重啟此案件。幫SA第一次脫罪的Innocent project拒絕了對SA再次提供法律援助。REDDIT上的Making a Murderer已上傳所有的庭審文字記錄。接受SA案件的的律師名叫，Kathleen Zellner。是全美成功脫罪記錄最好的冤案律師。在SA之前已成功幫助17人脫罪。KZ已前往waupon監獄會面了SA，review了38箱涉案文宗，KZ發推堅信SA被誣無罪。KZ重點質疑，如果焚尸地點是SA家的burn pit, 熱度將燒灼到SA的車庫，which is not the case. KZ堅信焚尸地點在別處。KZ認為，SA臥室非常之小，警方早期的搜查不可能不注意到，除非they search with their eyes closed.KZ認為，鑰匙上只有SA的DNA是疑點。KZ認為真兇擦拭鑰匙抹去了自己的DNA（同時把受害人的DNA也抹去），真兇隨后用鑰匙擦拭SA的衣物，從而使鑰匙沾上SA的皮膚細胞。KZ駁斥了NYK報道的在受害人車子里收集到了SA汗液DNA的做法，KZ和前律師同時指出，汗液里不含DNA.SA在入獄后給當年的DA（就是后來因為sexting被辭退的 Kratz ）寫信要求他注意被害人車子里其他人的指紋，Kratz與1月24日回復，全文如下： Dear Mr Avery: I got your letter dated August 28 2015, wherein you tell me your visitor list is full, and ask if I checked out other fingerprints found on Teresa Halbach’s car, telling me that these people could have “set you up” for this. I apologise for misunderstanding your letters from a couple years ago, as I thought you were interested in being honest about what happened and finally telling the whole story to someone. Since I’m the person who probably knows more about your case that anyone else, I hoped that you would chose me to tell your story to. Unfortunately, you only want to continue your nonsense about being set you. That’s too bad, because you had ONE opportunity to finally tell all the details, but now that will never happen. By the way, the difference between you and famous convicted murderers from the past is that they told their whole truthful story to someone, who then wrote a book about what actually happened and people got to understand both sides. I was willing to do that for you… but if you are going to continue to lie about what happened between you and Ms Halbach, I am not interested. If you change your mind, and want to tell your story someday, please contact me. Sincerely yours, Kenneth R Kratz SA辯護律師在Twitter公開指責Kratz無恥 喪心病狂，指責其為吸血鬼。Kratz的律所在YELP獲得無數咒罵。與此同時，SA父母的CAR SALVAGE在Google review收獲無數安慰與鼓勵留言。Dean Strang于一月發推: "We live in a country in which every time the police department or a prosecutor wants to issue a press release or hold press conference, the overwhelming majority of media outlets treat what the police or prosecutors say as received wisdom."

遇害人的通話記錄。SA的辯護律師指出此通話記錄指向真兇的存在SA律師Zellner1月29日連續發推：Forensic evidence identifies killers as well as evidence planters. Either way it takes down criminals. #MakingAMurdererThird visit WCC: SA thrilled about chance of new forensic testing--like innocent men always are.#MakingAMurderer似乎暗示新的 forensic testing取得了重大進展。

SA 于1月29日 親筆寫給支持者們的信。英國鏡報今日刊發文章，將嫌疑指向距SALVAGE車程九分鐘之外的一個德國籍男子，全文如下。http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/making-murderer-bone-evidence-could-72611791月29日，檢察官Kraz開始刪除自己推特里關于DNA的推文。SA律師繼續發推：RAV4: no mix SA & TH DNA, no SA prints but skin cells on latch/blood in car. So SA gloves had holes or planters did not.That special RAV4 key only absorbs DNA of Plaintiff in civil rights suit against MC not owner's. Magic SA律師繼續發推（2月13日）：Theresa's car was locked when it was found. Killers don't do that-- preserves the evidence. Kinda obvious who lockedSA現任律師ZELLNET的錄音訪談。http://fawesome.ifood.tv/news/10113067-making-a-murderer-kathleen-zellner-defends-steven-averySA律師繼續發推（質疑檢方重建的犯案過程）"TH throat cut (- blood) Head shot (- spatter) But RAV4 has her blood -so she was put in car & driven 20 ft to burn pit?" I've stopped updating since its now graduation and everything is so hectic. will update if any major turn of events occurs one recent update on brendan case :“Making A Murderer’s” subject Brendan Dassey’s hope of being freed from his lengthy stay in prison might not come to fruition. Despite the hard work of his legal counsel, it seems that Dassey’s war to innocence and freedom remains to be in the dark side.Early this week, Wisconsin's Attorney General Brad Schimel has requested a federal appeals court to let stand the conviction of Dassey found guilty in a case featured in the hit documentary of Netflix’s "Making a Murderer” per Fox News.In a brief filed with the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the attorney general pursues abandonment of Dassey's claim that his confession was forced.Furthermore, the lawyer stated that "substantial police coercion" is required for any confession to be involuntary, and that the Wisconsin Court of Appeals was right to affirm in 2013 that Dassey's was voluntary, hence, his appeal on the magistrate's ruling to the contrary should be reversed.Schimel also said that “The state courts’ conclusion that Dassey’s confession was voluntary is not only reasonable; it is entirely correct. Accordingly, Dassey is not entitled to relief”.Following the release of “Making a Murderer” last year, the series caught worldwide attention because of the controversial issues highlighted in the show. Although widely popular, the series’ network was claimed by authorities to be biased on the subjects’ innocence.According to Morning News USA, Avi Berk, a Legal Analyst of Appleton says, “What I think will happen is either the federal judge’s decision will be upheld, in which case Brendan Dassey will be released, or the federal judge’s decision will be reversed in which case his conviction will be upheld and he will remain in prison under the sentence for that conviction.”As previously reported, a Milwaukee-based federal judge overturned Brendan Dassey's conviction for the killing and rape of young photographer Teresa Halbach. 更新截止到2016年11月14日。